Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • Al Burns 30 posts 120 karma points
    Feb 26, 2016 @ 14:42
    Al Burns
    1

    Can't use SEOChecker on doc type located under a folder in Umbraco 7.4.1

    Umbraco 7.4.1 now allows you to create a folder under Settings - Document Types. However, if you add SEOChecker to a document type nested under a folder then it doesn't work. For example, given this document type structure:

    enter image description here

    Adding a content node of type "Test Page" results in this (with an associated angularJS type error "Cannot read property 'seoTitle' of null" thrown in the developer console):

    enter image description here

    Attempting to save and publish results in this exception:

    enter image description here

    If the document type is created at the root then all is well.

    If this is a known issue then can you confirm if there is a workaround to get this working, otherwise this could be a new bug.

  • Al Burns 30 posts 120 karma points
    Apr 04, 2016 @ 15:02
    Al Burns
    0

    Hi. Just wondered if anyone had any ideas on this?

  • Richard Soeteman 3277 posts 9339 karma points
    Apr 04, 2016 @ 15:08
    Richard Soeteman
    0

    Sorry didn't see this one, but it's fixed in SEOChecker 1.9.4 (latest version).

    Hope this helps.

    Best,

    Richard

  • Al Burns 30 posts 120 karma points
    Apr 04, 2016 @ 15:12
    Al Burns
    0

    Great, I'll check it out. Thanks for your reply.

  • Nils Frank 19 posts 89 karma points
    Feb 01, 2017 @ 14:02
    Nils Frank
    0

    We have kinda the same problem. It looks exactly the same, but we have it no matter where we add the document typ.

    I set up a clean umbraco 7.5.8 without any starterkit, installed the SEOChecker Package.

    Then i added a documenttype with the seo checker.

    And now I have the same problem.

    In angular model.value never gets a value and is always undefined.

    Best regards Nils

  • Richard Soeteman 3277 posts 9339 karma points
    Feb 01, 2017 @ 14:08
    Richard Soeteman
    0

    Hi Nils,

    Propably caching. This is not the same issue. Increase version number in /config/clientdependency.config and clear browser cache. Then it should be solved.

    Hope this helps,

    Richard

  • Nils Frank 19 posts 89 karma points
    Feb 01, 2017 @ 14:13
    Nils Frank
    0

    Hi Richard,

    I tried that, both with Chrome and Firefox, but no difference.

    Best regards Nils

  • Richard Soeteman 3277 posts 9339 karma points
    Feb 01, 2017 @ 14:23
    Richard Soeteman
    0

    Maybe there is a dll missing, can you check the umbraco log file for errors?

  • Nils Frank 19 posts 89 karma points
    Feb 01, 2017 @ 14:26
    Nils Frank
    0

    The log file has the following error:

    2017-02-01 15:12:14,663 [P1528/D2/T18] ERROR SEOChecker.DataTypes.PropertyEditors.PropertyEditorWrappers.SEOCheckerPropertyWrapper - SEOChecker: Error converting DB values to editor values
    Microsoft.CSharp.RuntimeBinder.RuntimeBinderException: 'System.Dynamic.ExpandoObject' does not contain a definition for 'alias'
       at CallSite.Target(Closure , CallSite , Object )
       at System.Dynamic.UpdateDelegates.UpdateAndExecute1[T0,TRet](CallSite site, T0 arg0)
       at umbraco.cms.businesslogic.propertytype.PropertyType..ctor(Int32 id)
       at umbraco.cms.businesslogic.property.Property..ctor(Property property)
       at umbraco.cms.businesslogic.Content.<InitializeProperties>b__f(Property x)
       at System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereSelectEnumerableIterator`2.MoveNext()
       at System.Collections.Generic.List`1.InsertRange(Int32 index, IEnumerable`1 collection)
       at umbraco.cms.businesslogic.Content.InitializeProperties()
       at SEOChecker.Core.Umbraco.DocumentWrappers.UmbracoDocument..ctor(Document doc, IContextInfo info)
       at SEOChecker.DataTypes.PropertyEditors.PropertyEditorWrappers.SEOCheckerPropertyWrapper.ConvertDbToEditor(Property property, PropertyType propertyType, IDataTypeService dataTypeService)
    

    and

     2017-02-01 14:16:54,570 [P19620/D3/T13] ERROR SEOChecker.DataTypes.Events.SetSEOValuesFromMappedProperties - Error saving mapped meta data
    Microsoft.CSharp.RuntimeBinder.RuntimeBinderException: 'System.Dynamic.ExpandoObject' does not contain a definition for 'alias'
       at Umbraco.Core.Cache.HttpRuntimeCacheProvider.GetCacheItem(String cacheKey, Func`1 getCacheItem, Nullable`1 timeout, Boolean isSliding, CacheItemPriority priority, CacheItemRemovedCallback removedCallback, CacheDependency dependency)
       at Umbraco.Core.Cache.HttpRuntimeCacheProvider.GetCacheItem(String cacheKey, Func`1 getCacheItem, Nullable`1 timeout, Boolean isSliding, CacheItemPriority priority, CacheItemRemovedCallback removedCallback, String[] dependentFiles)
       at Umbraco.Core.Cache.DeepCloneRuntimeCacheProvider.GetCacheItem(String cacheKey, Func`1 getCacheItem, Nullable`1 timeout, Boolean isSliding, CacheItemPriority priority, CacheItemRemovedCallback removedCallback, String[] dependentFiles)
       at umbraco.cms.businesslogic.ContentType.get_PropertyTypes()
       at SEOChecker.Core.Helpers.UmbracoDocumentHelper.GetPropertyAliasByDataType(String doctype, Guid dataTypeId)
       at SEOChecker.DataTypes.Events.SetSEOValuesFromMappedProperties.(IContentService , SaveEventArgs`1 )
    
  • Richard Soeteman 3277 posts 9339 karma points
    Feb 01, 2017 @ 14:37
    Richard Soeteman
    0

    That error comes from the propertyeditor converter

    Make sure that you have the correct syntax in the template

     var meta = Model.Content.GetPropertyValue<SEOChecker.MVC.MetaData>("seoChecker");
    
    @meta.AllTags
    
  • Nils Frank 19 posts 89 karma points
    Feb 01, 2017 @ 14:43
    Nils Frank
    0

    I had nothing in my template.

    Now i added your lines, but still the same error.

    Visual Studio shows the exception now:

    'System.Dynamic.ExpandoObject' does not contain a definition for 'alias'
    
  • Richard Soeteman 3277 posts 9339 karma points
    Feb 01, 2017 @ 14:46
    Richard Soeteman
    0

    really weird, works fine here and have not heard anyone with the same problem :-(. The issue you are posting is was something completely different..

    If you can share your environment I can have a look in debug mode?

  • Nils Frank 19 posts 89 karma points
    Feb 01, 2017 @ 14:53
    Nils Frank
    1

    Sure, i'm gonna zip the solution and put it on dropbox.

    I'll send you the link in the mail.

    Best regards Nils

  • Richard Soeteman 3277 posts 9339 karma points
    Feb 01, 2017 @ 14:58
    Richard Soeteman
    0

    Thanks, will have a look tomorrow.

  • Marco Teodoro 35 posts 98 karma points
    Apr 21, 2017 @ 15:27
    Marco Teodoro
    0

    Hi Richard,

    i've the same issue, did you found the solution for this?

Please Sign in or register to post replies

Write your reply to:

Draft