I'm wondering whether it would be possible to add the ability to add a custom item if there is no match. That way a content editor would be able to add new items without having to enter the developer section.
Is this something that it would be feasible to do.
The reason I would like the feature is for security. Quite often content editors are carefully restricted to particular portions of the site and specific workflows - Generally just the content and media sections.
If they have access to the developer section of the site then they can change stuff that they shouldn't be able to. We have clients that cannot possibly allow this but your tool is by far the best and closest match for the taxonomy needs we have.
image i have "News" content type and this content type have utaxonomy datatype with article and video values in it.
then i create three content type. two with article taxonomy and one with video taxonomy.
now i want to get nodes that have video taxonomy.
can i have something like this ?
Hi Vitaly!
Would you happen to know if there was any progress in this area? To allow developers to collect all nodes with a specific Taxonomy value? If so, how?
Or perhaps something still in motion to implement?
Dynamically add taxonomy items.
Hi there,
I'm wondering whether it would be possible to add the ability to add a custom item if there is no match. That way a content editor would be able to add new items without having to enter the developer section.
Is this something that it would be feasible to do.
Cheers
James
Hi James,
Thank you for you offer.
I'll think how it can be implemented.
Maybe I'll add a setting that will provide such an opportunity.
But not always the man responsible for the content, should be able to make changes to the DataType.
And I need to figure out how to properly implement this feature.
Thanks
Thanks for having a look.
The reason I would like the feature is for security. Quite often content editors are carefully restricted to particular portions of the site and specific workflows - Generally just the content and media sections.
If they have access to the developer section of the site then they can change stuff that they shouldn't be able to. We have clients that cannot possibly allow this but your tool is by far the best and closest match for the taxonomy needs we have.
Many Thanks
James
Hi James,
I understand you.
I will try as soon as possible to release a new version with a new component for working with tree and try to figure out how to help you.
Thanks
That's brilliant. Thank you! :)
Coming soon!!! :)
Oh that's great news! Well done!
Hi!
I've published new version!
I hope, I made the plugin better as you expected.
Thanks and good luck.
That's brilliant. Thank you! I shall test it at the earliest opportunity.
I really love this plugin!
Hello Guys.
can i get for example all content by taxonomy ???
Hi Shakib,
What do you mean?
Thanks!
image i have "News" content type and this content type have utaxonomy datatype with article and video values in it.
then i create three content type. two with article taxonomy and one with video taxonomy.
now i want to get nodes that have video taxonomy.
can i have something like this ?
Hi Shakib,
Sorry, but I didn't quite catch the issue.
Do you want to get all nodes in taxonomy from Data Type or all selected nodes from Content Type?
If you want to get all nodes from Data Type you need to use a TaxonomyService.
If you want to get all selected nodes from Content Type you need to use a GetPropertyValue extension for Content.
I hope I helped you.
If you have some questions, let me know!
i want to get nodes with specefic taxonomy
something like this in tags...
Hi Shakib,
Sorry, but I didn't implement this kind of extensions.
But, I'll try to implement it.
Thanks.
And Happy New Year!
Hi Vitaly! Would you happen to know if there was any progress in this area? To allow developers to collect all nodes with a specific Taxonomy value? If so, how?
Or perhaps something still in motion to implement?
Hi,
To implement this functionality is not so easy.
I already thought on this task, but don't have a good solution.
I'll think about it again later.
Thanks
is working on a reply...