If I want to associate relationships that have been forgotten with "relate to original" when copying, all I have to do is add a single line to the umbracoRelation table with the parentId, childId and relType columns, and nothing more?
That will work I think. But because your bypassing the API to create them I think caches will not be up to date so it's best to restart your application so caches get rebuild.
Thanks for the answer. This applies to an Umbraco 7.3.1 version, and I'm now testing the package you refer to, but haven't yet found the menu where the relationships can be linked. If the package isn't working, I will switch and try manual linking.
Thanks, but "Enable Relations" didn't appear on the document types (Umbraco ver 7.3.1), so I chose to enter the relationships directly in the database, and it worked excellent without having to restart the application.
Associate forgotten "relate to original" when copying
If I want to associate relationships that have been forgotten with "relate to original" when copying, all I have to do is add a single line to the
umbracoRelationtable with the parentId, childId and relType columns, and nothing more?Hi Tom,
That will work I think. But because your bypassing the API to create them I think caches will not be up to date so it's best to restart your application so caches get rebuild.
Or you could use this package : https://our.umbraco.org/projects/backoffice-extensions/umbraco-relation-editor/
This allows you create relations in the backend. So content editors can do it them selves.
Dave
Thanks for the answer. This applies to an Umbraco 7.3.1 version, and I'm now testing the package you refer to, but haven't yet found the menu where the relationships can be linked. If the package isn't working, I will switch and try manual linking.
Hi Tom,
Maybe this intro video of the package can help you out : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU3ifl_6xtk
Thanks, but "Enable Relations" didn't appear on the document types (Umbraco ver 7.3.1), so I chose to enter the relationships directly in the database, and it worked excellent without having to restart the application.
is working on a reply...