I installed ublogsy 3.0 with the latest nightly build of umbraco 6.1 and the old issue with the templates and IDs seems resolved. But, I still don't see the partials in back office. Is this a related bug? Or are the partials not supposed to show up in back office? I noticed if I create a test cshtml file and put it in the root Partials folder, it shows up in the back office.
I'm excited to have just installed 3.0.1 on umbraco 6.1.6. It looks like it has some very nice improvements since the last time I looked at uBlogsy 2.1 well over a year ago.
With my few times working with uBlogsy 2.1, I ended up always moving the razor macro files provided by the package up a folder, into the same folder as the rest of the site's scripts, so that they would show up in the backoffice. This also involved searching and replacing all instances of this path in all of the macros and templates.
I considered this only a minor problem and certainly easy enough to overcome, maybe just not the most intuitive or smooth process. So after installing 3.0.1 last night it is funny that the same problem symptom exists now, but with partial views in a subfolder instead of macroScripts in a subfolder.
Since it seems per U4-1651 that sub-folders aren't supported, nor do they seem to be coming any time soon, I just wanted to recommend that the next version of uBlogsy perhaps update paths to not use sub-folders anymore. Thus, not a backoffice problem, but just a different way things need to be packaged---for those of us using the backoffice editors instead of visual studio!
I am seeing something similar (well not seeing) using a fresh install of Umbraco 7.1.2 and uBlogsy 4.1. Are we to assume that you are waiting on Umbraco to handle folders inside of the Partials folders and that this is currently expected, not a bug?
partial views
I installed ublogsy 3.0 with the latest nightly build of umbraco 6.1 and the old issue with the templates and IDs seems resolved. But, I still don't see the partials in back office. Is this a related bug? Or are the partials not supposed to show up in back office? I noticed if I create a test cshtml file and put it in the root Partials folder, it shows up in the back office.
I guess that's an umbraco back office question.
Perhaps log a bug?
issues.umbraco.org
Thanks, I logged an issue here for reference if anybody is interested
http://issues.umbraco.org/issue/U4-2151
Hi there,
I'm excited to have just installed 3.0.1 on umbraco 6.1.6. It looks like it has some very nice improvements since the last time I looked at uBlogsy 2.1 well over a year ago.
With my few times working with uBlogsy 2.1, I ended up always moving the razor macro files provided by the package up a folder, into the same folder as the rest of the site's scripts, so that they would show up in the backoffice. This also involved searching and replacing all instances of this path in all of the macros and templates.
I considered this only a minor problem and certainly easy enough to overcome, maybe just not the most intuitive or smooth process. So after installing 3.0.1 last night it is funny that the same problem symptom exists now, but with partial views in a subfolder instead of macroScripts in a subfolder.
Since it seems per U4-1651 that sub-folders aren't supported, nor do they seem to be coming any time soon, I just wanted to recommend that the next version of uBlogsy perhaps update paths to not use sub-folders anymore. Thus, not a backoffice problem, but just a different way things need to be packaged---for those of us using the backoffice editors instead of visual studio!
Thank you!
Thanks for the suggestion...
I think keeping the folders is helpful for organisation.
I would personally rather umbraco support the subfolders to be honest.
Not to say your suggestion isnt valid, as it does have a use case.
I don't see any view and partial view into backoffice, but there are on disk....U7.0.3 + Blogsy 4.
I am seeing something similar (well not seeing) using a fresh install of Umbraco 7.1.2 and uBlogsy 4.1. Are we to assume that you are waiting on Umbraco to handle folders inside of the Partials folders and that this is currently expected, not a bug?
This is not a bug, but an Umbraco miss feature.
is working on a reply...