Please report confirmed 4.1 bugs in our issue tracker at CodePlex

cookcomputingxmlrpcv2dll

1/21/2010 11:21:37 PMAvatarrasbLocation: Copenhagen, Denmarkposts: 150Karma: 198

Could we update this DLL to the latest version?

There is a version 2.4.0 out now (released on dec. 19. 2009), and I need to integrate with another project that references this latest version of CookComputing.XmlRpcV2.dll.

Would be greatly appreciated, if we could do this!

Thanks,
RasB

1/21/2010 11:23:07 PMAvatarStephan KvartLocation: 11253, Stockholmposts: 145Karma: 135
Comment with ID: 23991

Doesn't an assembly redirect in web.config work?

 

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/7wd6ex19(VS.71).aspx

1/22/2010 12:17:47 AMAvatarrasbLocation: Copenhagen, Denmarkposts: 150Karma: 198
Comment with ID: 23994

Hmmm... I tried this, but it looks like the old version is unsigned and the new one is signed. 

So assembly redirect won't fly in this case :-(

/RasB

1/22/2010 12:32:07 AMAvatarLee KelleherLocation: Yatton, Bristol, UKposts: 452Karma: 1334
Comment with ID: 23996

Hi RasB,

I had the same problem a couple of weeks ago.  Couldn't find a way around it.

Currently, the only way is to use the Medium Trust version of Umbraco:

our.umbraco.org/projects/umbraco-403-medium-trust

Benjamin upgraded CookComputing.XmlRpcV2.dll to v2.4 ... so it should work straight-out-the-box for you!

Good luck, Lee.

1/22/2010 12:43:21 AMAvatarrasbLocation: Copenhagen, Denmarkposts: 150Karma: 198
Comment with ID: 23998

Hi Lee...

I'll take a look at that. I tried removing the strong name from the DLL, but that didnt't help either.

Thanks for the info.

/rasb

1/22/2010 1:19:54 AMAvatarrasbLocation: Copenhagen, Denmarkposts: 150Karma: 198
Comment with ID: 23999

Since the project I am referencing is available on CodePlex as well, I think it might be easier to recompile that with the older DLL for now.

But it would be really nice if the DLL was updated in the next release of Umbraco. Since they have decided to sign their DLL it makes it very hard for us to update it on our own without having to set up a medium trust environment. 

Good call though. That would have been a way to solve the problem had I not been able to recompile the other much smaller project.

/RasB

1/22/2010 10:00:27 AMAvatarLee KelleherLocation: Yatton, Bristol, UKposts: 452Karma: 1334
Comment with ID: 24017

Hi RasB,

That's exactly what I did... recompile the 3rd party project with older version of "CookComputing.XmlRpcV2.dll".

Umbraco v4.1 will have updated and signed assembly references, (so I am told).

Cheers, Lee.

1/22/2010 10:27:01 AMAvatarrasbLocation: Copenhagen, Denmarkposts: 150Karma: 198
Comment with ID: 24022

That's cool! I just wanted to make sure, since it wasn't in the beta.

But now that I write this I realize that the beta was released before the latest signed version of "CookComputing.XmlRpcV2.dll" ;-)

Really looking forward to 4.1!

/RasB

3/11/2010 11:45:16 AMAvatarNalle JacobssonLocation: Stockholmposts: 21Karma: 41
Comment with ID: 28621

I had to go the other way, I recompiled Umbraco 4.0.3 with the 2.4.0 version of the dll. Should I be worried, will this cause any trouble? :)

/N

Please login or Sign up To post replies